Where’s the Brand?
Marc Johnson | Oct 04, 2012 | Comments 2
When you look at players in the 80’s, few guitar brands dominated the landscape. You had Charvel, Jackson, Kramer, and ESP. That was really about it. Even the once monolithic Fender and Gibson were taking a backseat to these brands. The axes that guitarists were slinging were just as important as the guitarists themselves. Guitar gods carried their instrument like Apollo carried his bow.
By the 90’s, brands changed but the concept stayed pretty much the same. Even though bands like Nirvana and Pearl Jam were both anti-establishment, everybody still knew that they were playing Fenders and Les Pauls.
The metal bands of the otts were more like the 80’s. Synyster Gates and Zacky Vengeance had no problem peddling their signature Schecter guitars. While Charvel and Kramer were the big names two decades earlier, it was Schecter, ESP, and Ibanez’s turn during the 2000’s.
Now that we’re firmly in the 10’s, bands are starting to care less about the brands. I’ve been digging The Black Keys lately. Whether you’re a fan of the band or not, you have to admit they got themselves some interesting guitar tones. So, I decided to look up what kind of gear the guitarist, Dan Auerbach, uses. In recent Guitar World interview he said:
I’m not too picky about guitars. I love to collect them, mostly oddballs, but I’m not married to any brand or model. Whatever guitar has the best character for the song is the one I want to use, because if you’ve got a style, you’re going to sound like yourself no matter what guitar you play.
The Black Keys isn’t unique in this. Tom Morello of Rage Against The Machine and Audioslave has never been very particular about the brand of guitar that he uses. His “Arm the Homeless” Guitar is a Custom Performance Body routed to fit a Floyd and a Kramer Carrera neck.
Matt Bellamy from Muse jumps from Manson guitars – Who the hell is Manson? – or Fender, Gibson, Ibanez, or whatever the hell else he’s got lying around. The point is he’s not married to any particular brand.
Take a look at some recent guitar ads and see if you can find any face that you haven’t already seen a thousand times. Rags like Guitar Player are still packed with ads with EVH, Santana, Hammett, Lynch, and Clapton, recycling the same guitar players that they’ve been endorsing for over three decades.
Now, I don’t see a future where players will rush in to buy Dan Auerbach’s signature Silvertone or Harmony. The funny thing is, guys are still trying to find tones that they’ve heard on those Black Keys or Muse albums. They’ve just removed the branding from the equation. If they see Dan Auerbach playing a hollowbody, they’ll buy a hollowbody. It doesn’t have to be a Harmony H78 hollowbody; it just has to be a guitar and it needs to be hollow.
Maybe in the next decade, we’ll see more guitar gods wielding their weapons of choice.
Tiny URL for this post:
Related posts:
Filed Under: Commentary / Editorials • Featured • Guitars • Reference
About the Author:



















i can’t say I’m the same or different all of my guitars are fmic product 3 of 4 of my electrics are jacksons but each of them offered something different in tone bu all felt great when i played them for the first time to the present i buy instalments based on comfort right now its that compound radius and tapered profile mane the neck one will be a perfectly curved neck of a gibson. we all have our favourite guitars but in the end its the search for feel and tone that guide many players even the old guard chances are the bands of the 80′s even with endorsement deals wielded the fist guitars they got from their brand be cause they loved the neck and the tone of the body and pickups.
I’ve never been a guitar snob and I’ve heard astonishingly good performances on cheap or what most people would consider junk guitars. If it sounds good and plays good, then it is good to me.