Comments on: TTK’s Bugera Shoot-Out Video Poll

By: Kim

Kim — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:44:29 +0000

I have a bugera v55h.

It is easy to use, and sounds good!

By: XChuleX

XChuleX — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:32:49 +0000

I recently purchase A 333XL, it sounds more awesome than I anticipated.

By: Holmes1978

Holmes1978 — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 00:31:46 +0000

Loved the Video ,much respect !!!

By: Ross

Ross — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:16:14 +0000

1990 but i nearly would go for the 6260 only for i prefer the marshall crunch sound

By: tony93666

tony93666 — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:37:06 +0000

I grew up with the 80′s ‘raging wall of Marshalls’ tone, so the 1990 sounds sweet… but I already have a Marshall. The 6260 is badass, but if I were to buy a Bugera head – and I plan to – it would(will) be the 333, NOT the 333XL.

#1 – the XL’s ‘noise gate’ doesn’t work worth a flip
#2 – I’d rather have the tight/loose damping switch that’s on the back of the 333 than the presence knob of the XL, so I’m not paying the extra $50 for 2 features I don’t want.

By: Hamer59

Hamer59 — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:33:56 +0000

I’ve a Bugera 1960, it’s my favorite, a really Plexi amp.

I’ve replaced Bugera tubes by EHX tubes, it’s really better, more rich, more deep, more of caracter and identity.

Satisfied and happy.

By: sinndustries

sinndustries — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:04:36 +0000

I voted 6260- its not quite the 6262 as far as features, but is pretty close tonewise.

By: TheOzzk

TheOzzk — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:20:01 +0000

Great video TK!. IMO the 1960… Reason being: Plexi amp for less than $500!!!! Also love the head room if you want to play with fancy multi-fxs. The 6262 was a close 2nd.

Cheers!

By: metallicasilay

metallicasilay — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:55:04 +0000

They have all their own tone/sound, but I went with the 1990. I’m very happy with it and if I want more crunch/bite (metal), then I just add in my digitech multi-effects pedal.

By: Big Lou

Big Lou — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:08:02 +0000

That was supposed to be the 1990, sorry.